The problem

You don't need another AI strategy, proof of concept, or agent demo.

If any of these sound familiar, you're in the right place.

01

Your team uses AI. Decisions still don't stick.

Drafts come back polished, but they revive options you already rejected and ignore constraints you set last week.

02

Your pilots never become operations.

Proofs of concept impress, then stall without an owner, a baseline, or a business case.

03

AI is adding work, not removing it.

People spend their time reconciling sources, rechecking outputs and rebuilding context at every handoff.

04

The board wants results, not another roadmap.

You have the tools and the budget. What's missing is a workflow that performs, with numbers to show it.

The solution

We redesign the workflow, not just the tools.

You need a better way to run the work that delivers outcomes, with a team that can manage it. That’s where we start.

01Fixes: decisions that don't stick

One shared decision record, with an owner.

We make the current decision, its owner and the reason it changed explicit, and route open questions to whoever is accountable. Your people and their AI tools work from the same approved context.

Our point of view (opens in a new tab)
02Fixes: pilots that never become operations

Pilots built to become operations.

Design & Prove sets the baseline, owner and business case before anything is built. Then we run the workflow on real work until the results hold, and hand it to your team.

Case study: 12 months of planning, down to weeks (opens in a new tab)
03Fixes: AI that adds work

AI does the legwork. People make the calls.

We redesign who does what: AI researches, analyzes and coordinates; people decide and approve. Reconciliation and rework get designed out, not added on.

Case study: improving decision quality (opens in a new tab)
04Fixes: boards asking for results

Results measured from day one.

Every engagement starts with a baseline and is judged on business outcomes: decision quality, cycle time, cost and reliability. Not on how many agents we deploy.

See client results
How we work

Build → Operate & Optimize → Train & Transfer

Most firms stop at the handoff. We run the capability on real work until it performs, then make sure your team can run it without us.

Start here: Design & Prove

We pick one consequential workflow, measure how it runs today, and prove the approach on real work before you commit to the build.

1

Build

We redesign how your people and AI agents share the work: who decides, what AI researches, analyzes and coordinates, and where exceptions go. Then we implement it in your systems, with your data and constraints.

In practice: Improving decision quality in AI-enabled product teams

You getA working AI-enabled business process. Not a deck. Not a demo.
2

Operate & Optimize

We run it on real work alongside your team. We measure outcomes, find where it breaks, and tune responsibilities, approvals, quality, cost and controls until the results hold.

You getA proven capability with defined performance and economics.
3

Train & Transfer

We train the people accountable for it and hand over the workflows, agents, decision history, integrations, evaluation methods, SOPs and metrics, against handoff criteria agreed up front. The decisions and context behind the workflow live in teamctx, our open-source context layer, in your own repository.

You getA capability your team owns and improves without us.

The scaffolding comes down. Ongoing optimization is available if you want it. It's never required to keep the capability running.

What we hold ourselves to

People keep the consequential decisions.

AI does the research, analysis and coordination, and flags uncertainty instead of guessing.

Ownership is explicit.

A named owner is accountable for each decision and outcome. Agents are never the authority.

Business results are the scorecard.

Decision quality, cycle time, cost and reliability. Not how many agents we deploy.

You end up not needing us.

Support is optional, never a condition for the capability to keep working.

Where we apply it

Product Growth

Decide what to build, who it's for and why it wins, with named owners and a board-ready plan.

See Product Growth →

GTM System

A working go-to-market engine, deployed in your business and handed to your team.

See GTM System →

AI Optimization

AI that pays back: readiness, data foundations, AI cost, and function-by-function deployment.

See AI Optimization →
Client impact

Outcomes, not output.

Our most recent client work, newest first.

Customer SuccessApparel & Fashion

12 months of innovation planning, down to weeks.

A Fortune 500 apparel and lifestyle company benchmarked agentic AI against its own 18-month innovation process. A 40+ agent system, grounded in proprietary data, compressed roughly 12 months of planning and cross-functional coordination toward weeks — and leadership operationalized it.

40+Orchestrated agents
Months → weeksPlanning compressed
AdoptedInto the workflow
Read full case study →
Customer SuccessHealthcare Technology

18-month deals, closed in 6.

A healthcare platform cut enterprise cycles from 18 to 6 months and killed 90% of stalled deals with a three-role qualification framework.

18 → 6Months, sales cycle
90%Fewer stalled deals
StrongerStakeholder alignment
Read full case study →
Customer SuccessHospital Systems

The product was fundable. The story wasn't.

A hospital systems platform rebuilt its narrative into a Land → Expand → Deepen growth story and closed investor ambiguity across product, GTM, and financials.

1 MonthInvestor-ready
StrongerBusiness model
ImprovedInvestor engagement
Read full case study →

Industries we know

  • Healthcare technology
  • Hospital systems
  • Fintech
  • Ad tech
  • Travel technology
  • Professional services
  • Real estate technology
  • Apparel & consumer goods
How we engage

Clear scope. Your ownership. No lock-in.

Commercial terms

  • Fixed scope, milestone-billed. No hourly billing, no open-ended retainers.
  • Start small. Design & Prove on one workflow before a larger commitment.
  • You own the result: workflows, agents, context, SOPs and metrics.
  • Ongoing support is optional.

Trust and governance

  • People keep consequential decisions, with a named owner for each one.
  • Built in your systems, with your data and operating constraints.
  • Decision history in your own Git repository.
  • No lock-in. The context layer is open source.

Working across jurisdictions? Read: The sovereignty tax

Open source

teamctx

AI-native version control for team context. The decisions, rules and assumptions behind the work, approved by the people accountable for them and available to every AI tool your team uses. It's how a handoff keeps its reasoning.

  • MIT licence
  • Git-backed
  • Manager-approved
  • CLI + MCP
View teamctx on GitHub →

PE operating partners: prove a capability in one portfolio company, then adapt it across the rest.

Latest thinking

What we're seeing in AI, operating models and growth.

Our team

Senior operators, not generalist consultants.

Shikhin Agarwal

Shikhin Agarwal

Founder & CEO
25 years in tech and AI platforms.
Former P&L Executive at VC-funded social media, ecommerce, fintech, digital healthcare, and consumer SaaS companies.

Rajeev Singh

Rajeev Singh

Founding CTO, Advisor
25+ years in tech and AI
CTO at modern platforms, startups, e-commerce, fintech, AI, and blockchain.

Balaji Gopalan

Balaji Gopalan

CPO, Advisor
30+ years in tech, software and AI.
B2C and B2B across security, social, dev tools, edtech, martech, media, healthcare.

FAQ

Questions buyers ask us

What does StatsLateral do?

We build AI-native operating capabilities inside your business. We redesign a critical workflow so your people and AI agents make better decisions and execute faster, run it on real work until it performs, then train your team and transfer ownership.

How does an engagement start?

With Design & Prove. We select one consequential workflow, establish a baseline, and validate the approach on real work before you commit to a larger build.

What do we own at the end?

Everything needed to run and improve the capability: workflows, agents, project context and decision history, integrations, evaluation methods, SOPs and operating metrics. Ongoing support from us is optional.

How are engagements priced?

Fixed scope and milestone-billed against named deliverables. No hourly billing and no open-ended retainers. We scope on the first call; a statement of work typically follows within 5 business days.

Do we have to buy teamctx?

No. teamctx is our open-source (MIT) context layer for decisions, assumptions and ownership. Where it fits the workflow, we use it so that context transfers with the capability and stays in your repository after we leave. There's no licence to buy.

Who do you work with?

Leadership teams at Series B–D and PE-backed companies, typically $20M–$200M in revenue and 100–1,000 people, in the US and EU.

How is StatsLateral different from McKinsey, Bain, or BCG?

Senior operators only. Fixed scope with no hourly billing. We build and run a working capability rather than hand over recommendations, and we design every engagement so you stop needing us.

Pick one decision that matters.

How long would it take your team, and its AI tools, to find the current version, who owns it and what it affects? If the answer isn't obvious, that's where we'd start.

Book a 30-minute conversation